This article examines
the export tax incentive options for closely held companies in 2002 and offers a
number of alternative structures for reducing U.S. taxes and increasing cash
flow. My discussion here is
intentionally brief. It does
summarize, however, the many export tax incentive alternatives in the post-FSC
era. I am available, of course, to
discuss any or all of the above structures with you. Contact me at neal.j.block@bakernet.com,
if you have any questions.
By now you are aware
that the FSC benefits will expire for most taxpayers on December 31, 2001.
After that date, shipments of export property generally will no longer be
subject to the FSC benefits. Thus,
the IRA/FSC structure benefits effectively will end on December 31, 2001.
Keep in mind, however, that the FSC itself may remain in existence after
2001 for the receipt of FSC commissions for shipments made prior to December 31,
2001, as well as to pay dividends or to liquidate, depending upon the
circumstances of the FSC's shareholder.
It
is important to note that a liquidation of an FSC may avoid the alternative
minimum tax on FSC dividends, while a dividend distribution may not.
To the extent that you may have any questions regarding the impact of the
FSC termination on alternative minimum tax, please feel free to contact me for
further guidance.
Extraterritorial
Income Exclusion
The Extraterritorial Income Exclusion (ETI) replaces the FSC.
It has been available since October 1, 2000, and to date remains in
affect for the year 2001 and years thereafter.
Basically, it allows for the greater of a 15% of net income or 1.2% of
gross receipts (up to 30% of net income) to be excluded from income for
qualifying transactions. Generally,
the same transactions that give rise to FSC benefits give rise to ETI benefits. In addition, certain foreign manufactured goods may qualify.
The
future of the ETI is clouded, however, because a panel of the World Trade
Organization (WTO) has already held the ETI to be an export subsidy and in
violation of multilateral trade agreements.
As of this date the United States had just finished arguing its position
before the appellate body of the WTO. In
the meantime, the ETI benefit is a permanent one, which goes to the individual
level in the case of "S" corporations and entities treated as
partnerships. Thus, the 15% to 30%
reduction in taxation attributable to the ETI benefit must be weighed against
the other alternatives discussed below.
Shareholder
DISC
The DISC, the predecessor to the FSC and ETI, provides tax benefits to
basically the same types of transactions that qualify for the FSC benefits.
The DISC is allowed to earn net income equal to 50% to 100% of export
profits from the sale, exchange or lease of export property.
The DISC is also allowed to earn investment income from the investment of
certain qualified export assets. Dividends
from a DISC are taxable to its shareholders.
The
DISC structure most commonly used is a commission DISC.
It is an ideal vehicle for closely held "C" corporations.
A DISC held by the shareholders of a closely held "C"
corporation permanently avoids corporate taxation on the DISC commission. As such, it will generate greater federal income tax benefits
to a "C" corporation than either the current FSC/IRA structure or the
ETI benefit. In addition, it is not
under attack as is the ETI. Again,
I would be pleased to advise you with respect to those closely held
"C" corporations that need further information with regard to this
matter.
IRA/DISC
Structure The
IRA/DISC structure has been agreed to as a valid tax avoidance device by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS or Service).
The IRA/DISC is a DISC that is owned by an IRA and which receives
commission in the same manner as the shareholder DISC discussed above.
The DISC commission is fully deductible to the related supplier; however,
DISC distributions are taxable to the DISC's shareholders, irrespective of
whether they are individuals or individual retirement accounts.
Thus, a DISC that is owned by an IRA will recognize taxable income
(unrelated business taxable income or UBIT) upon the payment of dividends by the
DISC to the IRAs.
Roth IRA/DISC
Where a DISC is owned by a regular IRA,
the benefits of the DISC may be outweighed by the benefits of the ETI
partnership due to the second tax on the IRA's distribution.
However, where a DISC is owned by a Roth IRA, the Roth IRA/DISC is
generally the preferred vehicle, since greater cash may be put into the IRA and
all future proceeds from the DISC commission are reinvested tax-free and
distributed tax-free after the initial payment of tax.
Unlike a regular IRA, there is no double taxation of the DISC commission
when the IRA distributes its income to its beneficiaries.